Grand Jury



The Boulder Grand Jury was convened in 1998 to determine if there was probable cause to charge John and Patsy Ramsey in relation to their daughter's death. In 1999 the Grand Jury voted that there was probable cause to charge John and Patsy Ramsey with child abuse resulting in death and accessory to first degree murder. However the District Attorney Alex Hunter refused to sign the indictment, and did not inform the public of the Grand Jury's decision. Instead, on October 13, 1999, Hunter informed the media of his own belief that "we do not have sufficient evidence to warrant the filing of charges".

The Grand Jury's decision was not made public until 2013, fourteen years after the jury dispersed.

Background
District Attorney Alex Hunter was criticized for refusing to convene a Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury was the result of an unprecedented intervention by the Governor of Colorado. In 1998, after Detective Steve Thomas's resignation letter, the District Attorney's handling of the Ramsey case came under intense scrutiny.

Governor Roy Romer, backed by a panel of Colorado District Attorneys, informed Alex Hunter that he would be replaced by a special prosecutor if he did not replace his existing Ramsey case attorneys, hire new, more experienced prosecutors, and convene a Grand Jury.

Alex Hunter acted to save his job, removing the two attorneys in charge of the Ramsey case (Peter Hofstrom and Trip DeMuth) and convened a Grand Jury conducted by Mike Kane.

Evidence Considered by the Grand Jury
(possibly have separate page - timeline of grand jury . e.g. burke questioned Wednesday, May 19 1999)

The Grand Jury files remain under seal, so it is not publicly known what evidence and theories were considered.

Officials involved in the proceedings repeatedly described it as an "investigative Grand Jury", meaning that it did not confine its investigations to the theory presented to them by the prosecution.

"Former Denver prosecutor Craig Silverman said Hunter bent over backwards to present both sides to the grand jury, an unusual step for a prosecutor in a murder investigation."

Witnesses known to have testified include: Burke Ramsey, Ramseys' pilot Mike Archuleta, Ramseys' pediatrician Dr. Francesco Beuf, coroner John Meyer, Ramsey defense advocate John Douglas, DA's investigator Lou Smit, CBI forensics expert Debbie Chavez, CBI fingerprints expert George Herrera, Ramsey family friends John and Barbara Fernie, Pam Griffin, Fleet and Priscilla White, Ramseys' housekeeper Linda Hoffmann-Pugh and her husband Merv Pugh, Reverend Rol Hoverstock, Burke Ramsey's third-grade teacher Carol Piirto, handwriting expert Chet Ubowski, and police officers Linda Arndt, Michael Everett, Rick French, Ron Gosage, Jane Harmer, Larry Mason, Fred Patterson, Tom Trujillo, Barry Weiss and Tom Wickman.

Conclusions
The True Bills state:


 * "On or between December 25, and December 26, 1996, in Boulder County, Colorado, John Ramsey/Patsy Ramsey did unlawfully, knowingly recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat to the child’s life or health, which resulted in the death of JonBenet Ramsey, a child under the age of sixteen."


 * "On or about December 25, and December 26, 1996 in Boulder County, Colorado, John Ramsey/Patsy Ramsey did unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously render assistance to a person, with intent to hinder, delay and prevent the discovery, detention, apprehension, prosecution, conviction and punishment of such person for the commission of a crime, knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death."

Alex Hunter's veto


On October 13, 1999, District Attorney Alex Hunter announced


 * "The Boulder County grand jury has completed its work and will not return. No charges have been filed. ... The Ramsey family lives in a nightmare. There has been no end to the public lynching and speculation which marred this case from the beginning. ... The grand jurors have done their work extremely well, bringing to bear all their legal powers, life experiences and shrewdness. ... I must report to you that I and my prosecution task force believe we do not have sufficient evidence to warrant the filing of charges against anyone who has been investigated at this time. Under no circumstances will I or any of my advisers, prosecutors, the law-enforcement officers working on this case, or the grand jurors discuss grand-jury proceedings, today or forever, unless ordered by the court."

Hunter had in fact discussed the decision not to file charges on several occasions before the Jury completed its deliberations.

Another feature that made the Grand Jury unusual was that the District Attorney allowed a witness for the defense, Lou Smit, to testify.

Ramseys' claims of vindication
The Ramseys released a book immediately after the Grand Jury in which they claimed that "people would have to finally see the jury's decision as our vindication".

They and their attorney Lin Wood repeatedly referred to the Grand Jury as an example of the criminal justice system working as it should and claimed that "a jury of our peers" had dismissed the evidence against them.

Commentary and Legal Interpretation
Lawyers have discussed the

The Ramseys' lawyer Lin Wood dismissed the True Bills as "nonsensical".

Stan Garnett

For a district attorney not to endorse a grand jury's charge is "exceptionally rare," said analyst Craig Silverman, who was chief deputy district attorney in Denver for 16 years. Silverman described the past prosecutors' decisions in the case as sometimes "bizarre" and "strange". "Why would a D.A. have a grand jury deliberate and vote if he is not going to pursue the charges that they bring back?" Silverman said.

Boulder Police Department Chief Mark Beckner issued a statement saying: "It was difficult to remain silent for so many years ... Investigators at the time were disappointed in the then district attorney’s decision not to issue indictments. Cases are rarely perfect and often contain conflicting evidence. As a result, the opportunity to present the entire case to a jury may be lost forever." https://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/25/justice/jonbenet-ramsey-documents/index.html

A "Third Party"?
Some have suggested that

John Ramsey's Response
In a 2016 CNN interview, John Ramsey claimed that the Grand Jury indicted him and Patsy for child abuse resulting in death (a felony) because they had failed to check that the doors were locked and had left their security alarm off when going to bed.

When the interviewer asked him about the other charge (accessory to first degree murder) John Ramsey claimed he was not aware of that other charge.

When the interviewer suggested the "third party" idea, John Ramsey laughed and said "that's absurd".